Why Remote Support is often
superior to on-site:
Access to lab and baseline
systems
- It's like the difference between a
hospital and ambulance
- Troubleshooting often requires extensive
research
- Access to a lab with baseline systems is
critical in isolating problems
- Allows us to use familiar equipment in
our environment. More efficient
- Full access to reference materials
Suspend
Billing for Waiting Time
- Scanning & other diagnostics involves a
lot of waiting time
- Often need to contact vendors and wait
for return call
- Remote Server administration
- Software Upgrades
- Maintenance performed after hours when
staff not using the stations,
minimize disruption of productivity
- The luxury of less pressure afforded by
ability to "suspend the billing clock"
means more thorough testing
More Frequent, Proactive
Attention
- Instant availability. No scheduling. No lead time.
- No traveling fees
- No minimum billing
- More frequent attention otherwise not
feasible/justifiable
- Short-notice, on-demand "small dose"
assistance is feasible
- Frequent monitoring of data
backup operations
- Proactive security monitoring, audit and tests
- Remote assessment ahead of on-site visit
helps avoid second trip
On-site is required/better if:
- Hardware failure occurred
- Troubleshooting of complex wiring issues
- Installation/upgrade of new equipment
As you can see: Clearly, remote is
superior to on-site in most cases, provided you can
supply the
expertise and infrastructure to support it.
|